Wouldn't you rather get well first, and then do standard science to find out how it happened?
 

Are we really, for example, changing DNA?

Let's discuss that one briefly. We'll start with an example. When people are immune to HIV, it's sometimes because they lack a chromosome. This is not something we channeled. No, we just read the article in Science magazine.

Anyway, some questions about this are:

Are we removing that chromosome?

Is that chromosome necessary to do another job?  Test if it is.

If so, can we replace whatever results that chromosome was producing some other way?

Bear in mind: the removal of that chromosome may not be the only way to make someone immune to HIV. It might be possible for a Harmonic master to keep his chromosome and still be immune.
  

But how would you be able to check this with standard science?

Let's put it this another way: Bill Pelle is a Harmonic master who cured hepatitis B with Harmonic accessing. A standard scientist would still say it doesn't prove anything - Hepatitis B can spontaneously clear up like that.

Wouldn't you rather get well first, and then do standard science to find out how it happened?

Steps in your scientific religious methodology
  

W H U M
(pronounced "hum")